{"id":14420,"date":"2014-02-13T17:53:13","date_gmt":"2014-02-13T17:53:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/asile.ch\/wp\/?p=14420"},"modified":"2021-08-29T22:33:14","modified_gmt":"2021-08-29T20:33:14","slug":"hongrie-renvois-dublin-sous-conditions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/2014\/02\/13\/hongrie-renvois-dublin-sous-conditions\/","title":{"rendered":"Hongrie | Renvois Dublin sous conditions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Les renvois Dublin vers la Hongrie ne peuvent se faire qu\u2019apr\u00e8s examen par les autorit\u00e9s suisses des conditions auxquelles seront soumis les personnes renvoy\u00e9es, a jug\u00e9 le <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Federal Administrative Court'>TAF<\/abbr>, dans un arr\u00eat examinant en profondeur la situation en Hongrie. Si dans le cas examin\u00e9, la d\u00e9cision de <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='The SEM issues a decision to refuse to consider the application (NEM) when one of the grounds for refusal defined in the Asylum Act applies (e.g., under the Dublin Regulation).'>Nem<\/abbr> et de transfert vers la Hongrie du requ\u00e9rant \u00e9taient conformes au droit et que les transferts vers la Hongrie ne sont pas, par principe, illicites, une automaticit\u00e9 des renvois n\u2019est pas tol\u00e9rable, selon le TAF.<\/p>\n<p>Se basant sur les rapports de terrain, notamment du <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees'>HCR<\/abbr>, qui d\u00e9noncent l\u2019existence de graves d\u00e9faillances dans la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019asile, le TAF pr\u00e9cise que la pr\u00e9somption de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ne peut pas \u00eatre maintenue sans r\u00e9serve. Et qu\u2019il incombe \u00e0 l\u2019autorite\u0301 qui applique le r\u00e8glement Dublin II, de v\u00e9rifier de mani\u00e8re approfondie si le transfert entrainerait un risque s\u00e9rieux et concret de non-respect des droits fondamentaux du requ\u00e9rant. Par ailleurs, \u00abla renonciation au transfert pourra s\u2019imposer en particulier dans les cas o\u00f9 il est probable que des personnes vuln\u00e9rables remplissent les conditions d\u2019un placement en d\u00e9tention.\u00bb L\u2019entr\u00e9e en vigueur en juillet 2013 d\u2019une nouvelle l\u00e9gislation hongroise, ainsi que l\u2019accroissement des demandes d\u2019asile exigent une vigilance particuli\u00e8re des besoins sp\u00e9cifiques des personnes vuln\u00e9rables, ainsi qu\u2019un examen individuel des risques de mise en d\u00e9tention.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Les renvois Dublin vers la Hongrie ne peuvent se faire qu\u2019apre\u0300s examen par les autorite\u0301s suisses des conditions auxquelles seront soumis les personnes renvoye\u0301es, a juge\u0301 le <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='Federal Administrative Court'>TAF<\/abbr>, dans un arre\u0302t examinant en profondeur la situation en Hongrie. Si dans le cas examine\u0301, la de\u0301cision de <abbr class='c2c-text-hover' title='The SEM issues a decision to refuse to consider the application (NEM) when one of the grounds for refusal defined in the Asylum Act applies (e.g., under the Dublin Regulation).'>Nem<\/abbr> et de transfert vers la Hongrie du reque\u0301rant e\u0301taient conformes au droit et que les transferts vers la Hongrie ne sont pas, par principe, illicites, une automaticite\u0301 des renvois n\u2019est pas tole\u0301rable, selon le TAF.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[81,192],"tags":[476,187,194,1157,1156,223,244],"ve_numero":[509],"pays":[285],"ve_type":[1066,1090],"ve_action":[1077],"class_list":["post-14420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","category-en-bref","tag-detention-administrative","tag-dublin","tag-jurisprudence","tag-notre-regard","tag-revue","tag-taf","tag-vulnerabilite","ve_numero-ve-145-decembre-2013","pays-hongrie","ve_type-en-bref","ve_type-jurisprudence","ve_action-notre-regard"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14420"},{"taxonomy":"ve_numero","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ve_numero?post=14420"},{"taxonomy":"pays","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pays?post=14420"},{"taxonomy":"ve_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ve_type?post=14420"},{"taxonomy":"ve_action","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asile.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ve_action?post=14420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}