top menu

Plateforme d’information sur l’asile

Actualités et documentation sur les réfugiés en Suisse et dans le monde

Comptoir des médias

Une veille médiatique sur les questions d’asile, pour une information sans préjugés

Réfugiés | Préjugés et réalité

Des faits et des chiffres pour lutter contre les idées reçues

Revue Vivre Ensemble

Bulletin de liaison pour la défense du droit d’asile

Migr’asile

Des ateliers pédagogiques proposés par des acteurs de terrain

Association Vivre Ensemble

Service d'information et de documentation sur le droit d'asile

Glossaire de l’asile

Mémo[ts] pour parler d'asile et de migrations

Témoignages video

Exilia Films – Voix d’asile. Donner la parole aux actrices et acteurs de l’asile

ECRE | Garde-fous pour le contrôle des exactions aux frontières européennes

En ligne depuis le 10 novembre 2020

Les images choquantes de migrants et de demandeurs d’asile maltraités par les autorités croates s’inscrivent dans la tendance persistante et bien documentée des violations des droits de l’homme qui se produisent aux frontières européennes. Elles reflètent également l’impunité généralisée des autorités frontalières des États membres de l’Union européenne (UE) et démontrent la nécessité urgente de s’attaquer à ce problème de manière systématique. Huit organisations internationales de défense des droits humains demandent des changements immédiats et mettent en garde sur les garde-fous nécessaires à instaurer au sein du nouveau Pacte sur l’immigration et l’asile.

Amnesty International, ECRE, Oxfam, Refugee Rights Europe, Danish Refugee Council, Human Rights Watch, Save the Children, International Rescue Committee se sont adressées par écrit aux autorités européennes car celles-ci réfléchissent actuellement à la mise en place d’un mécanisme de contrôle indépendant pour enquêter sur les allégations de violation des droits humains aux frontières. Retrouvez ci-dessous un résumé des points essentiels de cette déclaration en français et plus bas le communiqué en anglais.

Résumée en quatre points, ces organisations détaillent l’importance de conditions d’application de ce mécanisme de contrôle. Il est tout d’abord nécessaire d’élargir la conception des types d’exactions qui pourraient être poursuivies, notamment relativement au lieu où elles se déroulent et au type exact de violation. Les refoulements aux frontières renvoient les personnes en dehors du territoir européen, ce qui rend la reconnaissance de la problématique plus difficile. De plus, des organisations indépendantes (spécialistes des droits humains) doivent mener ou être intégrées au processus d’évaluation de la violation. Ces organisations et d’autres acteurs issus de la société civile doivent également pouvoir alléguer des violations observées. La proposition de mécanisme doit préciser le processus de suivi afin que les autorités n’écartent pas la nécessité d’agir, une pratique courante dans plusieurs États membres. Il faut également, selon elles, instaurer des coûts politiques et financiers si les gouvernements des États membres ne coopèrent pas avec le mécanisme, ne le mettent pas en place ou ignorent ses conclusions. Le communiqué se conclut en affirmant que : « Les graves violations commises en toute impunité aux frontières européennes doivent cesser. Il appartient désormais aux députés européens et aux États membres de veiller à ce que les violations des droits aux frontières de l’UE soient enregistrées, que les responsables soient tenus de rendre des comptes et que la justice soit garantie pour les personnes concernées. »

Le communiqué “Turning rhetoric into reality: New monitoring mechanism at European borders should ensure fundamental rights and accountability” a été publié le 10 novembre 2020 sur le site du Conseil Européen sur les réfugiés et personnes exilées (ECRE).

Turning rhetoric into reality: New monitoring mechanism at European borders should ensure fundamental rights and accountability

The shocking images of migrants and asylum-seekers abused by Croatian authorities are part of the persistent and well-documented trend of human rights violations taking place at European borders. They are also a reflection of the widespread impunity of European Union (EU) Member States’ border authorities and demonstrate the urgent need to address this in a systematic manner.

As part of the recently announced Pact on Migration and Asylum, the European Commission proposed the establishment of an independent monitoring mechanism to investigate allegations of fundamental rights violations at borders. The proposed monitoring mechanism has the potential to address violations but only if it is expanded in scope; independence is ensured; accountability for violations is strengthened; and suitable consequences follow governments’ non-compliance. Failing this, the mechanism risks being a fig leaf behind which violations continue. The role of the Fundamental Rights Agency in developing guidance on the mechanism is welcome but since this guidance will not be binding on Member States, it does not address these concerns.

While Members of the European Parliament and representatives of EU Member States assess the proposal and prepare for negotiations, the undersigned organisations urge the following changes:

  1. Scope: Expand the scope of the monitoring to apply to all alleged fundamental rights violations by national border management authorities or during border control activities

The vast majority of unlawful practices take place outside of official border crossings, police facilities or formal procedures – in situations in which border management or law enforcement authorities assume they act outside functioning oversight mechanisms. Thus, any geographical (e.g. only at certain centres; border crossings) or procedural (e.g. only in relation to certain processes such as the screening phase) limitations to the scope of the mechanism would create blind spots and enable violations to continue. Furthermore, victims of push backs often end up on the other side of the border, which presents particular challenges should this render them outside of the EU. The proposal thus needs to be amended to ensure that the mechanism can consider cross-border events when the nature of the alleged fundamental rights violations so requires and act upon information received from individuals who find themselves outside the territory of the state where the alleged violation has taken place.

        2. Independence: Require the involvement of independent national authorities and civil society organisations and support  them through EU funding

Investigating violations of fundamental rights perpetrated by police, border guards or other government actors is politically sensitive. To ensure that the mechanism is credible and effective, it has to be managed by or at very least involve independent organisations. This can include national authorities such as National Human Rights Institutions or National Ombudspersons, which are regularly assessed for their independence or are subject to international standards guaranteeing independence as well as non-governmental organisations and international bodies. To further support independence, financial resources should be made available under Integrated Border Management Fund and in other non-national sources. It should also be made explicit that the mechanism can take into account and act upon relevant information provided by international organisations, non-governmental organisations, journalists, EU agencies and institutions even if they are not part of the mechanism.

        3. Accountability: Specify how Member States should investigate allegations to put an end to abuse, guarantee access to justice and ensure transparency

The litmus test for the mechanism is the extent to which it will trigger concrete action should it identify a risk of or receive allegations of rights violations. The proposal needs to specify the follow-up process so that authorities do not dismiss the need to act, a common practice in several Member States. Accountability to potentially affected individuals should entail guarantees to provide information about the monitoring mechanism, legal advice and effective access to justice. In addition, the obligation to prepare periodic, public reports on findings and conclusions, including on steps taken to hold those responsible for violations of fundamental rights to account and whether or how previous recommendations have been followed up, should be included.

        4. Consequences: Build in political and financial costs if Member State governments fail to cooperate with the mechanism, do not set it up or ignore its findings

To create a robust mechanism at national level, there need to be consequences for obstruction of the mechanism’s work (e.g. failure to grant access to border areas, documents or locations where victims of push backs find themselves) or non-compliance with its findings. For instance, it should be possible for the European Commission to withhold EU funding by linking the mechanism to the monitoring of the effective application and implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is an ongoing exercise and suggested precondition for Member States to receive EU funding in the next EU budget. Also, the European Commission should take into consideration the findings of the mechanism when assessing a Member State’s compliance with the asylum acquis.

The serious violations committed at European borders with impunity must end. It is now up to Members of the European Parliament and Member States to ensure that violations of rights at EU borders are recorded, that those responsible are held to account and that justice for individuals affected is guaranteed.

European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE)
Amnesty International
Danish Refugee Council (DRC)
Human Rights Watch
International Rescue Committee (IRC)
Oxfam
Refugee Rights Europe
Save the children

Download statement 

For further information: 

Danish Refugee Council, BORDER MONITORING MONTHLY SNAPSHOT FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, October 2020


En relation avec cet article

, ,